Your NetworkHas a $2.4MLeak.We find it in 90 days.

Most regional carriers signed their primary interconnect agreements between 2017 and 2021, when their traffic mix looked fundamentally different. SMS revenue was still material. International termination volumes were predictable. The big incumbents were negotiating from a position of relative parity.

Today you're running 40% more data traffic, 60% less voice, and your agreements still have minimum commitment clauses written for a world that doesn't exist. Every month you pay for capacity you can't use while over-purchasing on routes where you're actually constrained.

The fix is not renegotiation — it's restructuring. We remodel your actual traffic matrix against your current agreement terms and identify the specific clauses generating negative yield. In one recent engagement with a 340,000-subscriber regional carrier, we found $890K annually in minimum commitment penalties on three routes that could be restructured in a single amendment cycle.

"The agreement was written for a company that no longer exists. We just had to prove it with their own traffic data."

— Marcus Webb, on a 2024 MVNO interconnect restructuring

When billing reconciliation runs behind, the gap isn't neutral — it accumulates asymmetrically against you. Disputed CDRs age past your contractual dispute window. Wholesale partners bill you on estimates that consistently round up. Your own downstream customers have already churned by the time you identify the usage anomalies that predicted it.

In PE-backed rollup environments, this problem compounds with every acquisition. Each acquired entity brings its own billing platform, its own rating engine, its own set of manual workarounds that three people understand and nobody has documented. The integration roadmap says 18 months. The margin leak doesn't wait 18 months.

We have a structured rapid-reconciliation methodology that runs parallel to your existing systems. We identify the specific CDR classes generating the highest dispute rates, the rating rules generating the most variance, and the platform interfaces creating the most manual intervention. We fix the bleeds first, then build toward consolidation.

"Every day your reconciliation runs late, someone else's estimate is the number you're operating against."

— Diane Okafor, briefing a PE rollup integration team, Q1 2025

Traffic routing tables are living documents that stop living about six months after the last engineer who understood them leaves the company. What remains is a set of routing rules that were correct for a specific traffic profile, a specific set of vendor relationships, and a specific cost structure — none of which still applies.

We have reviewed routing tables at 23 carriers over the past four years. In every single case, we found routes where the carrier was paying premium termination rates to avoid capacity they already owned. In one case, a mid-market carrier was routing 31% of its highest-volume traffic through a third-party wholesaler at $0.006/min while holding an owned route with sub-threshold utilization at $0.0008/min.

Spectrum utilization gaps are more subtle but often more material. Licensed spectrum sitting below 40% utilization is a regulatory and financial liability simultaneously. We model the utilization economics against your license renewal timeline and identify the specific deployment or leasing scenarios that maximize yield before your next renewal cycle.

"You're paying someone else to carry traffic over infrastructure you already own. We just need your routing table and a weekend."

— James Reinholt, initial scoping call with a Midwest regional carrier